PERCEPTION OF SECURITY: 1,083 individuals were surveyed in the US, UK, Germany and Japan. 268 were IT executives with security oversight or insight into the mobile health and/or finance apps they produce. 815 were consumers that use mobile health or mobile finance apps.
(video is a reference; not part of Arxan study)
REALITY Of SECURITY: 126 of the most popular mobile health and finance apps from the US, UK, Germany, and Japan were tested for security vulnerabilities using tools from Mi3.[1] Apps approved by regulatory or governing bodies were also included in the security assessment.
90% OF 126 MOBILE APPLICATIONS TESTED WERE VULNERABLE TO AT LEAST 2 OF THE OWASP MOBILE TOP 10 RISKS.
84% OF FDA-APPROVED APPS AND 80% OF APPS FORMERLY APPROVED BY THE NHS WERE VULNERABLE TO AT LEAST 2 OWASP MOBILE TOP 10 RISKS.
98% OF APPS TESTED LACKED BINARY CODE PROTECTION AND COULD BE REVERSE-ENGINEERED OR MODIFIED.
84% OF APPS TESTED HAD POOR TRANSPORT LAYER PROTECTION AND COULD LEAD TO DATA AND IDENTITY THEFT.
>80% OF APP USERS WOULD CHANGE PROVIDERS IF THEIR APP IS KNOWN TO BE VULNERABLE OR IF A SIMILAR APP WAS MORE SECURE.
50% OF ORGANIZATIONS HAVE ZERO BUDGET ALLOCATED TO PROTECTING MOBILE APPS.
(video is a reference; not part of Arxan study)
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR APP EXECUTIVES:
SET YOUR SECURITY BAR ABOVE THE REGULATIONS
STRENGTHEN YOUR WEAKEST LINKS
MAKE SECURITY YOUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
FOR APP USERS:
ONLY DOWNLOAD APPS FROM AUTHORIZED SOURCES
DON’T JAILBREAK OR ROOT YOUR DEVICES
DEMAND TRANSPARENCY OF OF YOUR APP’S SECURITY
(video is a reference; not part of Arxan study)
Originally posted 2016-02-03 21:34:19. Republished by Blog Post Promoter
The post Mobile Application Security in 2016 appeared first on Information Technology Blog.
from Information Technology Blog http://ift.tt/1ULt3SG
No comments:
Post a Comment